Which takes more skill F1, Nascar, Rally Cars,?
I wouldn't think NASCAR, from just watching I'm thinking the Rally races.
Answers:
Who was Casey Mears going after in the garage after crash at Busch race?
I would have to say Rally racing uses more of a drivers skill than F1 or NASCAR. They ride the fine line of loosing traction on a regular basis. I would say rally racing is 80% driver 20% car versus F1 which is 25% driver 75% car versus NASCAR which doesn't count cause they only turn right twice a year.If were to take a Rally driver and put them in an F1 or NexTel Cup Car and they would be pretty sucessful, in part cause they know tires and traction probably better than anyone else.
F1 would be the next on my list, I think that they have rougher conditions from track to track with extreme heat in the drivers seat. Versus the other two. Put them in a NexTel Cup Car and I think they would be sucessful.
When did car customizing started and how and is there any links available ?
i think F 1 because of the monstrous g- forces created plus formula one drivers naturally produce more testosterone than any other professional athletes.AND mario andretti is so super hot
F1. coz there is no room for mistakes unlike nascar and rally..
In which country is Sakhir F1 circuit?
rally cars.. on F1 the cars is more important than the driver.. in rally racing the driver needs to be as good as godWhat will be the contributing factor to Toyota's success in NASCAR?
NascarDo any Nascar drivres smoke ciggarettes? Just curios if anyone knows?
Dudes its NASCAR!F1, the pressure is emmense on the a F1 driver compared to any of the other drivers.
With no doubt NASCAR.and its even tougher today driving then back when...the over-all skill level is better..and all thoses Cart & F1 drivers know it, some have come over(to Nascar)...but I dont remember too many of them even finishing in the top 5..and believe me, they just didnt get in 300 thousand dollar car without practicing.NASCAR
Why aren't there any female racecar drivers?
F1 cars 'cos they corner faster + accelerate and brake LOTS more Ferociously than any NASCAR or RALLY car.0-100-0 mph time = less than 5 seconds.
0 - 60mph = < 1.9seconds
0 - 125mph = < 3.9seconds
0 - 186mph = c. 8.4seconds depending on aerodynamic set-up
Top speed = c. 215mph+
186mph - 0mph = Less than 4 seconds, with a deceleration force of 4-5g
Have to handle corners such as "Eau Rouge" (flat out 175mph left-right flick into a 1km near vertical hill) & Blanchimont (flat out 185mph+ lefthander) at Spa-Francorchamps and the Parabolica at Monza (in around '98 they were throwing the car into there at about 205mph, braking to 120mph, then doing about 160 on the exit onto the 225mph main straight) - you screw up these corners, and your race is over in a huge shower of Carbon Fibre debris.
I am looking for a schematic for a 300 arctic cat 1998 for the engine?
its very hard to compare coz they are so different.in F1 there are a lot of G-forces, the racing line has to be perfect, braking must be right on-time, etc.
in NASCAR, the cars are very slippery and twitchy to drive, also, they race very close to each other and the driver must be careful to avoid collisions
in rally racing, cars keep struggling for traction and slide all over the place. also, if they hit something the drivers have to get out and repair their car asap
BOOGITY BOOGITY BOOGITY
nascar baby, nascar.
Who won the datona 500 in 2006?
definatly f1 the circuits are more demanding on the drivers physically and mentally. and 1 mistake then its all overF1 undoubtedly.The powerful engine needs skill to drive it.One wrong move and you will be dead.Also when a vehicle is going on such a speed nearly 300 kmph it's really hard to drive.So F1 drivers are more skilled.
More Questions & Answers...