Are the Nationals the worst team ever?


Question:Before you answer let me remind you that the Nationals have not started an inning with the lead all year and have only had a lead for one inning. (they had a walk-off win)

Answers:

What's up with the Twins tonight?

YES. In fact. they haven't scored in any game in the first THREE innings. They are horrible!! Sorry, but I have to call them as I see them.

Chow!!

Whos the pirates closer?

Naw, they aren't the worst team EVER. They could give a chase to the Met's record loss total, but I think they'll win enough games. I'll agree they don't scare anybody though.

What do you think the AL East standings will be for the 2007 year?

no actually kansas city royals has that title. (sorry royals fans if any). Nationals can improve and they will specially after they resigned soriano last yr.

Why did all the Mets players shave their heads?

If they can somehow manage a worse record than the 1899 Cleveland Spiders (20-134), then yes. Honestly, they won't be THE worst when it's all said and done. They'll just be the league's punching bag and might finish with about 105-115 losses, which isn't extraordinary.

Does fielder chioce count as a hit?

not as of yet

What was the highest attendance for a baseball game?

Washington Senator They had never had a winning season, before they were the Minnesota Twins

Why is Hank AAron acting like a bitter old man about attending a monumental moment in baseball?

I wouldn't say ever. But I do feel Manny Acta got one of the worst managerial jobs out there, because this team doesn't really have that much talent in a competitive NL East.

Unfortunately, it's going to be a long season for the Nationals and it's probably a team that will lose close or over a 100 games. Really, on paper it doesn't look that bad when you have a solid player in Zimmerman and Lopez, and a bunch of castoffs or young players. Pitching on the other hand, is going to be a problem all season long because after a injury proned Patterson who do they have that's actually good?

Jerome Williams? Young, unproven players? Come on, with that kind of starting rotation your not going to win very many games. And the bullpen looks okay, but I think their rotation is what makes them or breaks them. Once Patterson is hurt, who's going to step up? Ohka is gone, Ramon Ortiz, Armas, and Livan. That's nearly 3/4 of your rotation gone.

Acta is in a tough situation, where he doesn't have much to work with. In with, I feel sorry he took the job.

I am the coach of a t-ball team. I am looking for a poem to give them at the end of season. Any help is great!

No, just this season. The 2003 Detroit Tigers (42-119) are the worst team ever.

The 1962 Mets (40-120) had the most losses ever, but they were an expansion team that played before free-agency and big money contracts, making success more difficult and less likely for them.

The 2003 Tigers were bad in part, because they were lazy.

What Baseball position should I chose?

1899 Cleveland Spiders (20-134),
1962 Mets 40-120

Anyone think the Astros have a shot at the playoffs?

Statistically, the mets hold that title (Cleveland played in the dead-ball era, the game was dramatically different back then, hense why the Mets record is referred to as the "Modern Day record"). Nats have as good of chance as any to break the mets record though...

What is pontooning or maybe platooning in baseball? I couldn't quite tell which word they were using,?

No.

That honor belongs to the 1962 NY Mets.

How do you throw a curveball.?

So, I take it you've never heard of the '62 Mets? Or the '03 Tigers?

Has their ever been a baseball pitcher that could throw right and left handed?

The '62 Mets are the worst team ever, but the Nationals may give them a run. As a Mets fan, I really hope the Nationals win a bunch of games against the Phillies, Braves and Marlins and keep the '62 Mets as the worst.

Does anyone remember the tigers starting center fielder before granderson?

records dont always tell how bad a team is. maybe the nats can turn things around, but they are REALLY bad. think about it, the expos were really bad and they at least had vlad and this nats team was the same players from the expos. they really have no cap room and not a whole lot of young talent.

Have you ever seen 4 homers in a row? Like the Sox JUST DID??

no the mets were and always will be

Yankees repeat?

They got killed by the Braves yesterday and are doing horrible so far, so yeah

What does EPH stand for?

Things aren't looking very well in DC right now, but I don't think the Nats are going to be as bad as the 62' Mets. The original Mets is the gold standard for futility.

Will Ichiro leave the mariners?

No, 2003 Detroit Tigers

More Questions & Answers...
  • Who's on first?
  • Where can I find All-Star Game pins, key chains, and such, on-line?
  • How good is my fantasy baseball team? the only catagory is Home runs?
  • Will a metal baseball bat get damaged by hitting tennis balls? My bf wants to kno!?
  • Does anybody else think Steve Phillips is an idiot?
  • On the list of players you listed how much time did the spend on dl and how much time did pete rose?
  • Weird, but I don't Know Why?
  • Should the Dodgers trade Takashi Saito soon as his value his high?
  • Who wore #2 for the Brooklyn Dodgers in 1945?
  • Do you think dice is ready for the mlb?
  • This article contents is create by this website user, Sports1234.com doesn't promise its accuracy.
    Copyright 2007 Sports1234.com     Contact us    Terms of Use

    Sports