Babe Ruth is the Sultan of Swat, because he had nearly 4,000 less times at bat than Hank Aaron.?
Question:Hundreds less than Bonds too.
Answers:
Will Detroit and Kansas City???
I don't think it was that many at bats (4000)Will Shea Stadium be demolished after Citi Field is built?
The Sultan of Swat was a nickname given to Ruth while he was playing, decades before Aaron or Bonds.It's a play on the term swat, which is another way of saying hit, as in a Ruth swatted another home run.
Has a mlb game been won without the winning team getting any hits?
Ruth and Aaron will and have gotten their rewards and recognition. I don't think Bonds ever will.Heck, if you take that logic to its extreme, then Esteban Yan is the greatest hitter in baseball history - sure, he hit 713 fewer homers than the Babe, but he also had 8395 fewer at bats!
How was the new york yankees frist start??/?
The Sultan of Swat was a nickname given to Ruth while he was playing, decades before Aaron or Bonds.It's a play on the term swat, which is another way of saying hit, as in a Ruth swatted another home run
Whats the point of having so many innings in a baseball game??
babe was also way betteraaron was just homeruns not hitting for average and taking walks like babe
Why r the new york yankees struggling this season and do u think they'ell make the playoffs?
You speak the truth. Ruth is the greatest hitter, or player, the game of baseball has ever seen. To be that good a hitter, and an unbelievable pitcher to boot, clearly separates him from everyone else. He also revolutionized the game by bringing the Home Run to the fore. Prior to his emergence as a power hitter, coupled with the banning of the spitball/shineball, made teams look for power hitters and made the fans look forward to a Ruthian clout than anything else. Ruth was indeed the Sultan of Swat.If you are using AB as the reason. Mark McGwire has the lowest AB per HR. McGwire is not the greatest.
AB per HR
1. McGwire 10.61
2. Ruth 11.76
3. Bonds 12.93
4. Thome 13.52
5. Pujols 13.95
37. Aaron 16.38
I agree with you on Ruth over Aaron, but not by your reasoning. Although had he played as many years one can only wonder what kind of numbers he would have ptu up.
More Questions & Answers...