How big a mistake did India make in not playing Pathan?
India needed a fifth bowler, but didn't use Pathan in any of the games. Would he have made a difference, rather than using Ganguly and Sachin to fill in the gaps, even though they took wickets?
Answers:
How i can get DD National Channel (india) in the middle east?
ya you r correct like this match pathan is good bow as well as battingWhat is the importance of playing sachin in the team watching his faliures?
They should have played Sreesanth instead of Munaf and Irfan Pathan instead of Zaheer Khan or Agarkar. And taking Harbhajan was not a good decision. He is a laddu bowler.Conspiracy - Ireland Vs. Pakistan!?
mayb u r right..v shud hv playd Pathan..but the Q is who wud he replace??...
but yestrday our bowling was reasonable..it was the batting that let us down..
but pathan cud hv hit a few 4s nd 6s...but nothing sure..
at such a stage one mistake cud cost u heavily/...
like it has
Who will win Cricket World Cup 2007?
very big mistakeCan Indians beat Aussies in sper eight round?How do indians better than the Aussies?
One cannot say its a mistake cos the team wasn't bad but just that its more about Ad's and cookies rather than cricket. So I think even if Pathan or Sreesanth was included it wouldn't have been much differenceWhy are aussies bringing bloody stupid kangaroos to the match?
oh my god, that match was terrible, i left after the 6th wicket, they just aint concentratingCriket. my wife wants to know how we beat scotland in the world cup?
yup ! u r right ..v cud hv given him a chance. .. v all knew he wud help us out whnever v need him :)
itx jst dat .. .chappelx over confidence .. n not hvin faith in his matex.. ;)
More Questions & Answers...