Does anyone agree that it would be better to have penalties?
instead of the away goal rule? I don't agree with them when you draw in the league but this is different!
Answers:
Which player will you buy for MU if you were Fergie?
There's a certain thrill associated with penalties,but that will wear off if it is used every time there's a draw.Extra time though seems a better idea than the present away goal rule.Do you think david nugent will?
ya good ideaLiverpool vs Chelsea- *Who will be the winner*-?
change of rules may be a good ideabut it is not upto us to comment on this
(sports1234.com must consider of getting answers from experts)
How did the white stripes "Seven Nation Army" became popular and turned into soccer chant?
I like how they do it...Away goals rule and then extra time and then penalties if a tie still remains. But I can see where you are coming from. It would make sense to just go on with a PK shootout instead and let the tied be broken with a split 50/50 chance for both teams. But I think since the actual goals are hard earned (meaning scored in actual play), they should come before a 50/50 dead ball strike right on goal.How many of you feel that Stephen Ireland at Manchester City is nothing but a ball losing worm?
bad idea,if they do so then all clubs wiil not pounce on the goals.teams with better penalty savers will be benefittedI like Manchester united but people tell me they are hyped up to much by media?
yep away goals is silly look wat happened to newcastle and barcaCristiano Ronaldo , is he a diver ?
Yeah! its a very good way to find a winner in case of a tie...I don't agree with the away goals rule and the games which have 2 legs...More Questions & Answers...