Is Ninjtsu the deadliest form of Martial Art?
Answers:
If you're going for deadly, learn to shoot assault riffles.
Does tae kwon do work in the streets when fighting ? just an opinion ? any type of tkd?
What the hell IS more deadly than arbitrarily killing someone as opposed to first letting them know 6 months ahead of time while letting them see all of your fight videos which were recorded in front of huge audiences and then meeting them in a ring with cops refs and docs all around where they can knock you out or submit you, all with a long paper trail for law enforcement to follow in case you succeed in pulling off the dastardly, devious, and downright dirty deed and can still escape the venue?In fact, it is better to just sneak away, hide, and make sure your enemy doesn't even know who you are or why he's even your enemy! Ninjitsu!
Don't even mess with that "fair fight" BS.
Hell, don't even mess with that "fight" BS.
What is the difference between a submission grappling class and brazilian jiu jitsu class?
No...Which is best for real life situations, karate or boxing?
Muay THai is kown as one of the worlds most deadly arts. I will admit I do not know a lot about Ninjitsu. But I do know that Muay Thai is one of the hardest periodI'm sorry, but this question is dumb.
Anything that teaches you how to kill is dealy, there is no "deadliest" it's a question that is subject to the opinion of the practioner.
There is no one person in the world that has studied every system in enough depth to know this answer.
Any experience with Internal Martial Arts or Inner Power?
If you are reffering to killing your foe, well it is one of the few that does indeed do that.This form of Martial Art has so much to do with patience and skills not seen in other arts. Like being a patient hunter so to speak stalking the prey till you get your chance. It is all about deception and has a form of honor that differs from Samurai.
In Samurai it is an dishonor to be defeated, in Ninjitsu it is a lesson. The Ninja will be back at his convienence and timing, a Samurai will come ahead in direct honor.
Ninjas from past had a code of death that is similar to Samurai. All fits into the way of Bushido. But a Samurai will not stop at being defeated facing death easily, as a Ninja will be back with a new form of attack if they feel they will not succeed.
Ninjas exist today as all ancient arts had and have their followers. Just this science is about killing not fighting. And they are known to be quite good at that.
The skills of a Ninja are similar to what a hunter learns being silent and patient in a tree stand, or watching a sliver of road from a reed filled canal. Then it is about weapon skills.
This is similar to what a modern soldier will tell you about watch duty in a combat zone.
Next comes espionage and all the skills of stealth.
Then the skills of jitsu.
From a deadliest view point yes it is.
How many styles of the martial arts are there?
Any martial art can be deadly. But the idea behind ninjutsu is to learn how to live, not to kill. There are killing techniques in ninjutsu, it is after all a combat art. But why even ask this question? The martial arts are not about which one is more deadly, or how many people you can beat up. It's about respect, making you a better person, learning defend loved ones and strangers if need be.No. Nor does a martial art need to be deadly to be a good one. People are deadly not a martial art anyway. I know a very very highly ranked individual in a very difficult martial art. this art can be/is deadly. He is far more skilled than I'll ever be. He has shown me things that if he had made one error I would have been badly hurt. However, this is NOT what he wants so I was not hurt in the slightest. I imagine that should you threaten his wife or grand daughter you might end up missing some body parts but short of that I very much doubt he will ever hurt anyone. In other words then whether an art is deadly or not depends totally on the person who does it & not on the art itself.
A Thai physical build better for Muay thai?
The deadliest martial art would probably be ones based completely on being unarmed.While being a Ninja was based on getting the poison knife in the marks back in originality, which made it very deadly. If a person trained in Ninjitsu ran into someone trained in unarmed fighting with completely equal training time and experience in their own forms, the unarmed fighter would have the upper hand in that he wasn't trained in using surprise so it wouldn't matter if he had it or not, while the Ninja was trained in surprise attacks so while he may not need it all the time it would have eaten some training time that could have been spent in other areas making him somewhat less trained.
Also the fact that being unarmed meant going without a weapon a Ninja trained armed/unarmed so his training was even more spread out, making him even less experienced compared to someone who focused on only unarmed techniques.
To go even further, it's completely possible to disarm a very experienced opponent with weapon, the only way to disarm a unarmed person is to kill them or knock them unconscious.
yes! it was on natioal geographic. check it out on you tube. look under fight science
More Questions & Answers...