What is better? An 800m runner going down to 400m or a 200m runner going up to 400m?
Answers:
Britains first gold medal winner in summer olympics 1988?
Tricky. The only decent 400 & 800 male runner I can recall is Alberto Juantereno, due in part I think to the different types of running involved. An 800 runner only has to sprint normally for 100-150 metres at the end of the race but a 400 runner has to sustain it for pretty much the whole race.The best 200 & 400 runner is obviously Michael Johnson but again I am struggling to recall anyone else. John Regis struggled to move up from 200 and he was raw power.
All things considered, I would have to say the step up from 200 woukld be better as they are both all out power surges.
Who was the 1986 Seoul Olympic Tekwandou gold winner?
i would say an 800m to a 400m. i think that it would be waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay easier for them because they are used to and event that is twice as long. Therefore they will be able to go fasterI run a half mile in about 2:12 i have about half a year to drop 12+ seconds. How possible is this?
although you would think the 800-400. as these days the times and race for the 800m is practically a sprint anyway. They have the muscle/speed endurance but look at Michael Johnson who was a wonder at the 200/400, I haven't really seen a successful 800m runner do a world class 400m since KRATOCHVILOVA Jarmila & Alberto JuantorenaWhat were the 2002 Winter Olympics Crosscountry skiing Triathlon Results?
Good question. I would say a 200 m going up to the 400. It is easier to go up the ladder than go down.More Questions & Answers...