Nadal takes battle of surfaces in 3 sets. why?
why cant my man federer take him?
Answers:
Win-Loss record vs Federer ... Who?
Nadal took the match because he and Federer are rather closely matched. I also think the slower speed of the clay and some of the odd bounces on the grass side gave Nadal the edge. Federer almost won with the first and third sets going into a tiebreak. It could have gone either way, and had Nadal not gotten the first set, the match would have been over in two sets.Federer is getting close to Nadal on clay, but Nadal is still no match for Federer on grass. I wouldn't worry, I think your man Federer will be taking one away from Nadal on clay very soon. It may not be this year, but it will be soon.
Well, I'm sure, since it was an exhibition, that they weren't playing their hardest. I doubt either one of them wanted to really go out there and beat or embarass the other one. It's just a nice attention-grabbing lead-up to the summer Slams. I wouldn't read anything into it except that it was pretty cool.
Did you find it odd when Andre Aggasi married Steggi Graf?
good question. But i can feel federer closing in on nadal. Especcially after last year's french open. Nadal just needs to lose concentration for a small moment and thats enough for federer to win. I mean federer is much more talented than nadal but how can you expect him to win in all surfaces? The reason is that he can. This is the test. He needs to win french open to even be considered as the greatest player ever. And i think he can do it this year. He is much more versatile and knows how to win, its just clay, roger will figure it out.May I know If somebody knew Table Tennis place in New South Wales, Australia?
Because Nadal knows how to beat Federer. He is not intimated by Federer and is more aggressive than Federer in their matches. Although this wasn't a major tournament I still think both took it seriously and I'm pretty sure Federer is mad that he lost because there are really no excuses he can make due to the court being half and half. Nadal has a mental edge over Federer and this match makes that edge much stronger.How exactly do I hit a nice, fast forehand that makes the ball go straight?
everybody on the TW board seems to think it was staged .so nadal could win in his hometown since federer won when they played in his hometown..i didnt see the match but they said they were back and forth just like a script lolHow long has Roger Federer been Nº 1 in the Atp Ranking?
I didn't think Federer took it seriously. He just plays these exhibitions to try new things or to prepare for big events. Nadal is just playing better than Federer right now. Federer hasn't won a title in his last 3 tournaments and Nadal is on a roll as of right now. The exhibition match was close and if Federer tried harder in winning the match then he would have won pretty convincingly.What female tennis player won Wimbledon in 1986?
Nadal is only 20 and improving with every tournament. I think Nadal will take over #1 spot very soon. Nadal is just starting as a tennis player and already has 20 titles under his belt and is the only rival of Federer.More Questions & Answers...