Federer vs Sampras on grass at their primes. Who wins?
I'd take Sampras, since he's got bigger serve and good volley game.
Answers:
How or where can i find a place to play tennis in Tomball, Texas ?
I'd take Sampras in 5. He played much stiffer competition in his Wimbledon victories (Becker, Courier, Ivanesavic, etc). While Federer hasn't had much competition. Through Sampras' first four victories, his opponents in the finals had combined for 11 grand slam victories, while Federer's have accumulated only 3. Sampras is also a better serve and volleyer.Sampras agree
nadal, neither sampras or federer were great grass players
What you think of Martina hingis ?
Sampras. He had a great serve. it would be a very good match. but we are yet to see federer's prime.so the answer could change in time. and wtf. Nadal?!? what was that guy smokin. nadal is clearly a clay court player. duh look at wimbledon this year. he got spanked by federer. i dont think that ppl who have no tennis knowledge attempt to answer this questionFederer is a "genius"! I bet on Roger!
Roger has also a big serve and is not bad at volleys. He has a very good physical condition and he can play as a baseliner as well.
How are coaches of professional tennis players paid?
I DONT KNWI wanna hit my forehand with a lot of top spin but it keeps on going to the net.help!!!!!!!!!!
no doubt SamprasOk...Classical question.
Roger has proved he could take on Sampras on grass (See Wimbledon 2001). Still, Sampras wasn't in his prime, and Roger had not yet fullfilled hiw actual potential. I'd say Roger in four sets, because he's plain perfect and all rounded. Sampras was good in serve and volley, Federer is good in everything. He has the answer to almost everything in grass.
A classic I say Sampras in 5 sets. That had the potential to rival Borg-McEnroe 1980 Wimbledon final. Hey pony, Sampras and Federer have won at least 8 Wimbledon titles between them. How can you say they weren't great grass players??
Name the golfer who Chris Evert is currently dating?
This is a tough one.I guess we will never know. They are both too good. But let me say something, why don't you phrase the question this way, if they were to play 10 games on grass, who wins the most. Because I bet you, Sampras will win some, and Federer will win some. It will be like 6-4. But who wins 6 of the 10 games, we will never know.
I don't think it will be one-sided. Good question though.
Should I protect the edge of my table tennis paddle?
Federer. He's even more dominant than Sampras was, only losing a few matches each year, and usually only to Nadal. Moreover, I believe the level of play as improved slightly in the 10 years that separated their primes, making Federer's game look even more impressive.More Questions & Answers...