Why is there no good tennis players except Federer?
Answers:
Rules for playing the tiebreaker in a tennis match.?
This is why you cannot determine just how good Federer is. To be considered great one must have some consistent competition. How good would Tiger Woods be if he were constantly pressed? Who knows? This is why Muhammad Ali (vs. Frazier, Foreman) is judged to be one of the best while Larry Holmes had nobody and is never ranked among the top, even though he had a better record than Ali.Andre Agassi... great career?- YES!?
There are some excellent tennis players out there, Nadal, Roddick, Blake, Murray, Davydenko etc. It's just that Roger is way ahead of everyone else. It's not that these guys are bad players, its just that they have to compete against a tennis genius who sometimes makes the best of professionals seem like amateurs.Whats the difference between tennis shoe and running shoes?
what about Rafa Nadal? he can kick Federer's butt.Your prediction: Djokovic or Murray? Who do you believe will win tonight's match and why?
Well the good tennis players have since retired... In his prime Andre Agassi was really good. And Pete Sampras has since retired. And for some players.their strengths are his weekness.*ie..Nadal is excellent on clay*Where can i find practices and drills for tennis?
what about Nadal, Murray, Djocovick,rafael nadal. duh?
What is the 3.5, 5.0,ect,ect, players?
there are lot of good players aside from federer. one good example is rafael nadal. he is the king/master of clay and federer lost to him in 5 occassions (federer never beaten nadal on clay while nadal beats him on hard surface. nadal gave a good match during last year's wimbledon final). federer stars seem to fade right now with 2 consecutive losses to canas (in his most favorite surface). given a time, i bet that nadal will surge to number 1 ranking next year. djokovic is also becoming a force to recon with. we have sampras before and agassi but they retire respectively and they too have their own records at their head. going back to nadal, he wins 72 consecutive victories at clay and still counting. he even matched the records of 3 consecutive wins at barcelona open beating canas and 3 consecutive wins at montercarlo series beating who else but FEDERER.Feelings about the aero pro drive racquet?
nadal is the next best playerFederer is a very good tennis player. He can serve,volley and has the best forehand in the game. Federer is so dominant because he is a complete tennis player. There are several good tennis players such as: Roddick - Best 1st serve in the history of the game but inconsistent on his backhand side and lacks speed.
Nadal - Excellent forehand but is too relunctant to enter net and only has an average serve.
Safin - Good all around game but is too hot tempered
Murray/Djokovic - Excellent players who lack experience
It's not only Federer, what's Rafael Nadal doing?
And there are Novak Djokovic, Andy Murray, Andy Roddick, Tommy Haas, Fernando Gonzales,....
What? Do you think the top 10 aren't good players?
In a game of tennis where did they get the score 15,30,40?
There are some real good players out there other then federer. Like Nadal he has 72 straight wins on clay and roddrick with that power speed serve are really goodexcuse me there are plenty players out there just because hes number one does not mean that hes the best. well he may be more talented but im sure theres better to come
I just got a new racket, should i put on an overgrip or play my racket as it?
there are alot of good tennis players beside federer. there's nadal who is quickly learning how to play on other surfaces, besides clay. andy roddick has gotten better with his new coach. There have been some recent losses by federer latly, that wasn't even to nadal. plus, you can only be the best for so long. by the way, i would'nt be suprised if someone came out of nowhere to beat federer in a grand slam someday.There are good tennis players out there! Roger Federer is just definitely a genius in many areas (balance, hand eye coordination, etc...) but there are many other players who are more than just a threat to him. As many have said, Nadal aka "The King of Clay" can definitely push a couple of Federer's buttons on the court. Richard Gasquet is also known to have more "natural talent" than Roger Federer (just less experience). There are a myriad of players that can be even thought of as a challenge to our #1. They just need time to climb up to the top. Plus, it's not like Roger Federer is the master of everything. He could be known as a "jack of all trades" sort of player. He doesn't really focus on one specific strength but he hones them all. This sort of gives other players like Nadal, Henman, Hewitt, Safin, and all those other great players a different sort of advantage. When Sampras was playing, he had a sort of "kill and get the win as fast as you can" sort of playing style due to his fast play serve and volleying. Andre Agassi also sped things up because he put his time into honing a specific technique (hitting on the rise) and using it as his own game. Roger Federer is a good player, but it's not like he doesn't have his weaknesses.
How should my partner and i play this team?
thats not true!!Roger may be the best, and i am an avid fan, but players like Nadal or Roddick are very good too!
also there are players who are great talents on junior tournaments and will maybe one day become even better from Rogi!!
AND WHATEVER, WHAT AM I DOING HERE?
AM I NOT A VERY GOOD PLAYER?
ARRANGE A MATCH WHENEVER YOU WANT, I WILL BEAT YOU BEFORE YOU EVEN REALIZE IT!!
More Questions & Answers...