Do you think that ECW, RAW and Smackdown should come together as one again?
I think they should.
Answers:
I just DO not understand this?
yes they should and then there can be a variety of matches to be seenWHAT NUMBER DID SHAWN MICHAELs ENETER IN THE ROYAL RUMBLE?
Nope. There's too many superstars to fit in one show..Does shemale wrestling exist ?
I think that they should bring together Smackdown and RAW as one keeping ECW as its own brand. Bringing all three together would be great too. WWE now has THREE world champs and two tag team champions-- too many in one federation.yeah
Yes. I never liked the split in the first place.
Have the roster now should be in the minor promotion. The totally messed up the tag division with the split.
I say cut the roster down to 50, and have the guys do both shows again. If they keep ECW change the name, and use it for a show to let mid-card guys get more air time.
For all those that will say the roster is too big.
1. Attitude had about 50-70 man roster and the shows were great.
2. There is still a place called OVW were the guys like Visera and the Highlanders and go wrestler while still being in WWE.
3. Never in the history of wrestling has one company had 2 World heavyweight champions. Your supposed to be #1 not 1a and 1b.
Do you thingk that rey mestirio will go to raw?
No, just because threre are so many superstars we'd hardly ever see any of them in a two hour show weekly. I like certain superstars and don't like othrers like the sandman, I think he's overated. Kane is definetly my favorite wrestler.Did HBK really get hurt last night or was it planned?
i think no.its better for them to stay where they are now.bcuz its too hard for wwe to pay attention to the other superstars that is not that active too much.Pics of the Version 1.0/ Mattitude logo?
No, because then there would only be one show of WWE a week!And what would happen when Survivor Series comes and they want to do the whole Smackdown vs. RAW vs. ECW thing?
I like it the way it is!
True, they are all three separate brands, but they still are all WWE!
I THINK I HURT# 1 Edge Head (Mr DEDEDE)'s FEELINGS?
I think i will have to agree with you there. Because:1. Every superstar need not be used every single week. Hence you don't have to see the same superstar doing the same moves every week. ( look at smackdown nowadays)
2. They can have some different matches.For example- Lashley vs taker or Kane vs Triple h( hell in a cell)... Shawn Michaels vs Batista or something like that. Otherwise people in different brands rarely fight each other.
3. Instead of Having smackdown vs raw vs ecw, they can still have traditional survivor series matches. Just the name won't be smackdown vs raw vs ecw. How does it make a difference?
4. There will be one undisputed champion instead of three.
5. Superstars will be more fresh enabling them to give their 100% each time. Even now they give their best but if ECW, RAW and SMACKDOWN come together they will have more rest and won't risk injuries easily.
6. There will be new storylines with different guys which will keep fans at the edge of their seats.
THATS WHY ECW, SMACKDOWN AND RAW SHOULD COME TOGETHER!
OH HELL YEAH
While I would really like to say yes, the reason I can't is because, there is so much talent on all three shows right now, that everyone would not get to be seen. It would be the same people over and over again. I think they should put all three together and do a full promotion draft, where everyone is traded and all new story lines begin.
More Questions & Answers...