Tri Branding?
Question:When the brand extension split the rosters in 2002, PPVs originally featured both shows, but over time it came to Raw, Smackdown and eventually ECW each having their own PPVs with interpromotion only occuring at the big four (Rumble, Mania, Summerslam, Survivor Series).
Starting from Backlash 2007, all PPVs will now feature all three brands. Is this good or bad?
Does it take away from the importance of trhe big four?
Answers:
Can OUR hero John Cena stop Great Khali ,tonight on RAW ??
No not at all. I love all the guys featured on all the PPV's.Tell me why you's hate john cena?
that's good becuz u see alot of wrestler's in alot of matchesand that would be got foe wwe fans
How do you like watching a very young undertaker?
Not at all, It would PPV's more better with all brand on the same show, because if say ECW had their own PPV again there would be many matches as they don't have many superstars on their roster.Why do wrestlers that have been in the wwe for a LONG time have so flat mucles now?
d reason that allPPV are tri brand cuz vince wants more money nobody will want buy ECW ppv and vince is giving us no choice to but to watch it bad ideaWould it been more amusing that THE CONDEMNED opened on the same day as SPIDERMAN 3 ?
No not really because usually there are more matches on the big 4.More Questions & Answers...